Q. What is the most interesting thing you have learned about the Suffragettes?
Suzana J, Malta
A. Where to begin! I suppose I was most astonished by just how strong the prejudice was against the Suffragettes. It came not only from the politicians and those with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, but from women themselves, of all classes, who either believed that their brains were ‘differently composed’ and fit only for homely duties, or were too blinkered or selfish to care about the conditions in which a huge proportion of the female population was forced to live.
Q. What is your personal opinion of the Suffragettes?
Suzana J, Malta
A. Mixed. If we are talking about the Pankhursts, I am second to none in my admiration for what they achieved and their courage and dedication in doing so. However, I am not sure that I would have got on with them. Christabel, particularly, seems to me to have lacked compassion. She put the battle for women’s suffrage before everything and she expected everyone else to do the same. Having said which, she was a natural leader and in times of war such people are necessary, but heroes are not easy to live with.
My greatest respect will always be for the foot soldiers – the poor, uneducated women who were willing to risk so much and sacrifice so much for what must have seemed a pretty hopeless cause a lot of the time.
Q. How did you go about researching the background and the story?
Connor Vaughn, Middlesex
A. The struggle for women’s suffrage is very well documented, both in accounts written later by the protagonists and in the newspapers and journals of the day. I was also lucky enough to come across a radio interview from the 70s in which the granddaughters of some of the major players talked about their memories and experiences of the time. The main difficulty was in deciding what to leave out. Here I was helped by the fact that the story is told in the first person. Maggie couldn’t be everywhere so that in itself limited what could or couldn’t be included and helped me to focus on telling the story from a particular point of view.
Q. The relationship between Maggie and Fred is obviously fraught with the tensions of the times- was this the starting point for the book, or did the idea for this relationship come later?
Elizabeth Clack, London
A. I’m afraid I’m not nearly organised enough to have spotted the outcome of Maggie’s first encounter with Fred! It just sort of grew out of itself. I don’t really plan ahead when I’m writing, I wait and see what comes out of each situation as I go along. That probably sounds ridiculously trite and I don’t want to give the impression that it’s easy or sensible to write this way. It’s just how I do it.
Q. Did you have a clear idea of how the story would develop and end before writing this book?
Victoria Whitehorn, London
A. I think my previous answer probably covers that! I knew I wanted to take a character who knew nothing about the women’s movement and look at it through her eyes. I wanted above all things to avoid hindsight and Maggie’s ignorance and gullibility allowed me to do that, but I certainly had no idea how far she would go in the WSPU or at what point her story would end. She decided that.
Close